sycamore

"The statement of Zacchaeus [Luke 19:8] is to be understood as a reaction to the initiative of Jesus and to the objections of the crowd. In order that Jesus may be freed from the suspicion of consorting with a sinner he makes a public declaration of his intention to live a new life. In such a situation a declaration of intent was an adequate sign of repentance. At the same time, his action is to be seenas an expression of gratitude to Jesus for his gracious attitude to him, and as an example of the sort of change in life that should follow upon the reception of salvation." *

This particular comment struck me quite odd, yet remarkably difficult to pass by. The second line is what makes this account leap off the page - In order that Jesus may be freed. . . - and thus creates a shocking situation. Most people know the basic story of Zacchaeus (p.s., from what I can gather he was a wee little man) and thus are familiar with the fact that Jesus invited himself to this tax-collector's home. Two observations: 1) Jesus appears to have no hesitation to invite himself to someone else's house, which is a bit weird; 2) by going to this certain house he would have raised a number of eyebrows, as evidenced in Luke 19:7 with the response of the crowd. In fact, the response of the crowd shows that this activity of entering into a sinner's home was the same as sharing in Zacchaeus' sin.**

But at the end of the story the weight is given to the action of Zacchaeus to free Jesus from the reputation he had taken upon himself. What an incredible portrait of grace is demonstrated (once again) here to see the length to which God will go to reach his beloved. Such a magnificent humility is found in Jesus' willingness to bind himself to a sinner with the intent purpose of making that sinner pure. How is this possible? Jesus knows that holiness is not corrupted, but that it is the more contagious entity. In other words, holiness influences unholiness.

So in spite of the separationism of many modern evangelicals, this is not the solution. Rather than sit back and let this world pass on by, it is our duty to engage the sinfulness of this world on its own terms. For only then can we allow our holiness to pervade it and draw it to Christ.

And what about ourselves?
Christ has bound himself to us in our sinfulness.
Have we freed him from such a reputation?



*I. Howard Marshall, The Gospel of Luke NIGTC (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1978), 697.
**Craig L. Blomberg, Contagious Holiness: Jesus' Meals with Sinners (Downers Grove: IVP, 2005), 153.